IMS3502 Studio 6: professional practice 2 - Semester 2 , 2007
Unit leader :
Helana Scheepers
Lecturer(s) :
Caulfield
-
Henry Linger
-
Peter O'Donnell
Tutors(s) :
Introduction
Welcome to IMS3502 Industrial experience project. This 6 point unit
follows on from IMS3501. During this unit you will finalise the
project that you have started in semester 1.
Unit synopsis
Studio 6 is the culminating experience of the student in dealing with a "real world" client. This is the environment in which students develop much of their theoretical work into an experiential event, when they bring together elements of much of their other studies in the later stages of the SDLC. In addition, students will deepen their knowledge of fundamental studio elements such as project management, professional and technical communication and social implications.
Topics include: Database access through the Web Group dynamics Conflict resolution User documentation Technical documentation Formal handover presentation Rescoping and negotiating changes with the client
Learning outcomes
Knowledge and Understanding
Students will have knowledge of:
C1. Re-scoping a system
C2. Conflict resolution
C3. Delivery and handover of a system
C4. Database access from a Web environment
C5. The later elements of the SDLC as an approach for project management
Attitudes, Values and Beliefs
A1. Students will exhibit professional documentation of their work both as individuals and as a group.
A2. Students will appreciate the value of group work, and its fundamental contribution to the systems process.
Practical Skills
Students will exhibit skills in:
P1. Presentation
P2. Project management
P3. Communicating with clients
P4. Group integration
P5. Students will acquire further skills in the use of applications that may be required by the client.
Relationships, Communication and TeamWork
S1. Group work is not the only type of study undertaken in the studio environment, but as students progress from first to third year group work takes on an increasing significance. In Studio 6, students will have an increasing reliance on the integrated behaviour of the group, and much of the student's performance will depend on outcomes of group work.
Workload
Your workload commitment to this unit are: - three hour tutorial
- 1 hour seminar
- half
hour personal reflection which include: writing a blog about the weeks
activities, keeping records of time spent on this unit and generally
reflecting on what you have learned.
- approcimately 7 1/2
hours of additional work which may include the following: developing
code, doing research about different aspects of systems development,
development of documentation
Unit relationships
Prerequisites
Before attempting this unit you must have satisfactorily completed IMS3501.
Relationships
IMS3502 is a core unit in the BIS degree. Before attempting this unit you must have satisfactorily completed IMS3501. You may not study this unit and You may not study this unit and CSE3301, GCO2819, GCO3819, CSE3200,
FIT3015, FIT3039, FIT3040, FIT3038, FIT3025, FIT3026, FIT3016, FIT3017
(Translation for CSE3200), FIT3114, FIT3115, FIT3116, FIT 3048, FIT3117, IMS3000,
IMS3501 in your degree.
Continuous improvement
Monash is committed to ‘Excellence in education' and strives for the highest possible quality in teaching and learning. To monitor how successful we are in providing quality teaching and learning Monash regularly seeks feedback from students, employers and staff. Two of the formal ways that you are invited to provide feedback are through Unit Evaluations and through Monquest Teaching Evaluations. One of the key formal ways students have to provide feedback is through Unit Evaluation Surveys. It is Monash policy for every unit offered to be evaluated each year. Students are strongly encouraged to complete the surveys as they are an important avenue for students to "have their say". The feedback is anonymous and provides the Faculty with evidence of aspects that students are satisfied and areas for improvement.
Student Evaluations
The Faculty of IT administers the Unit Evaluation surveys online through the my.monash portal, although for some smaller classes there may be alternative evaluations conducted in class. If you wish to view how previous students rated this unit, please go to http://www.monash.edu.au/unit-evaluation-reports/ Over the past few years the Faculty of Information Technology has made a number of improvements to its courses as a result of unit evaluation feedback. Some of these include systematic analysis and planning of unit improvements, and consistent assignment return guidelines. Monquest Teaching Evaluation surveys may be used by some of your academic staff this semester. They are administered by the Centre for Higher Education Quality (CHEQ) and may be completed in class with a facilitator or on-line through the my.monash portal. The data provided to lecturers is completely anonymous. Monquest surveys provide academic staff with evidence of the effectiveness of their teaching and identify areas for improvement. Individual Monquest reports are confidential, however, you can see the summary results of Monquest evaluations for 2006 at http://www.adm.monash.edu.au/cheq/evaluations/monquest/profiles/index.html
Teaching and learning method
In this unit we try to simulate a real systems development experience.Groups of students work as a team with support from tutors and academicstaff to develop a system for a real client. The seminars are developedto address specific issues during system development and we alsoinclude speakers from industry. The studio sessions are there forstudents to work on their project and to receive help from tutors andacademic staff.
Communication, participation and feedback
Monash aims to provide a learning environment in which students receive a range of ongoing feedback throughout their studies. You will receive feedback on your work and progress in this unit. This may take the form of group feedback, individual feedback, peer feedback, self-comparison, verbal and written feedback, discussions (on line and in class) as well as more formal feedback related to assignment marks and grades. You are encouraged to draw on a variety of feedback to enhance your learning. It is essential that you take action immediately if you realise that you have a problem that is affecting your study. Semesters are short, so we can help you best if you let us know as soon as problems arise. Regardless of whether the problem is related directly to your progress in the unit, if it is likely to interfere with your progress you should discuss it with your lecturer or a Community Service counsellor as soon as possible.
One of the important feedback avenues for students in this course is
the Blogs. Students are required to write a blog on a weekly basis that
reflect on the progress, learning and experience they have had during
the week in terms of the project, group work or any aspect that they
deem appropriate. The bolg is read on a weekly basis by the tutors to
monitor progress of students.
Unit Schedule
Week |
Topic |
References/Readings |
Key dates |
1 |
Testing testing 1 2 3 |
Jake Zhivov |
|
2 |
Industry speaker |
TBA |
Test Plan and UPDATED Project Interpretation, Standards and Governance due |
3 |
Industry speaker |
TBA |
|
4 |
Industry speaker |
TBA |
|
5 |
Usability and organisational fit |
TBA |
|
6 |
User documentation |
TBA |
|
7 |
Industry speaker |
TBA |
|
8 |
Industry speaker |
TBA |
|
9 |
Closing up the project |
TBA |
|
10 |
Careers |
TBA |
UPDATED Functional Requirements Specification and Design Specification due |
Mid semester break |
11 |
Industry speaker |
TBA |
|
12 |
Industry speaker |
TBA |
Project Documentation (Test docs, user docs) due |
13 |
Finally the end |
TBA |
Presentation of final system and Working System due; Group Project debrief during week 13/14 |
Unit Resources
Prescribed text(s) and readings
There are no set texts, however students are expected to have
developedtheir own collection of texts, urls and other reference
materialsduring the course of their studies. Resources related to the
seminarseries will be distributed during the seminar or listed on the
unit website.
Recommended text(s) and readings
There are no recommended texts, however students are expected to
havedeveloped their own collection of texts, urls and other
referencematerials during the course of their studies.
Required software and/or hardware
The studio environment provides a large array of software and
hardwarefor students to use within the studios, and some items are
availablefor overnight loan. Please see the unit web site for
up-to-datelisting. Anything additional is to be negotiated between the
studentteam and their clients. FIT will not normally provide
additionalhardware or software.
Equipment and consumables required or provided
Information about computer use for students is available from the ITS Student Resource Guide in the Monash University Handbook. TheStudio
environment is well equipped with computers and peripherals.Studio
computer peripherals (cameras, scanners, laptops, zip drivesetc.) are
available for student use. This equipment is accessible viathe FIT loan
system - ask the Caulfield FIT technical staff for moreinformation, or
log a request via their web site: http://www1.infotech.monash.edu.au/webservices/servicedesk/requestform/index.cfm
Study resources
Study resources we will provide for your study are:
Study resources provided for your study: - MUSO Website (this web site contains information for FIT3015, FIT3047 and FIT3048)
Library access
The Monash University Library site contains details about borrowing rights and catalogue searching. To learn more about the library and the various resources available, please go to http://www.lib.monash.edu.au. Be sure to obtain a copy of the Library Guide, and if necessary, the instructions for remote access from the library website.
Monash University Studies Online (MUSO)
All unit and lecture materials are available through the MUSO (Monash University Studies Online) site. You can access this site by going to: - a) https://muso.monash.edu.au or
- b) via the portal (http://my.monash.edu.au).
Click on the Study and enrolment tab, then the MUSO hyperlink. In order for your MUSO unit(s) to function correctly, your computer needs to be correctly configured. For example : - MUSO supported browser
- Supported Java runtime environment
For more information, please visit http://www.monash.edu.au/muso/support/students/downloadables-student.html You can contact the MUSO Support by: Phone: (+61 3) 9903 1268 For further contact information including operational hours, please visit http://www.monash.edu.au/muso/support/students/contact.html Further information can be obtained from the MUSO support site: http://www.monash.edu.au/muso/support/index.html
Assessment
Unit assessment policy
The unit contain a number of deliverables as outlined below. To pass
the unit you must gain at least 50% of the total marks for the
unit.Your mark will be assessed and then adjusted according to the
weeklyreflections and peer assessment.
Assignment tasks
-
Assignment Task
Title :
Test plan
Description :
Weighting :
10%
Criteria for assessment :
Due date :
Week 2
-
Assignment Task
Title :
Description :
Weighting :
10%
Criteria for assessment :
Due date :
Week 2
-
Assignment Task
Title :
UPDATED Functional Requirements Specification and Design Specification
Description :
Weighting :
10%
Criteria for assessment :
Due date :
Week 10
-
Assignment Task
Title :
Project Documentation (Test docs, user docs)
Description :
Weighting :
20%
Criteria for assessment :
Due date :
Week 12
-
Assignment Task
Title :
Presentation of final system
Description :
Weighting :
10%
Criteria for assessment :
Due date :
Week 13
-
Assignment Task
Title :
Working system
Description :
Weighting :
20%
Criteria for assessment :
Due date :
Week 13
-
Assignment Task
Title :
Weekly reflections (blog)
Description :
A reflection on a weekly basis of what you have learned and experienced
during the week. You are required to do 10 per semester + 1 at end of
semester. These blogs will be used to evaluate your personal
contribution to the project and might affect your mark up to 20%.
Weighting :
Personal contribution evaluation can affect your mark up or down with 20%
Criteria for assessment :
Due date :
Weekly and 1 at the end of the semester
-
Assignment Task
Title :
Peer Assessment
Description :
A reflection on a weekly basis of what you have learned and experienced
during the week. You are required to do 10 per semester + 1 at end of
semester. These blogs will be used to evaluate your personal
contribution to the project and might affect your mark up to 20%.
Weighting :
Personal contribution evaluation can affect your mark up or down with 20%
Criteria for assessment :
Due date :
At the end of each deliverable
Examinations
Assignment submission
Assignments (on paper) will be submitted to the Studio Tutor, with
theappropriate cover sheet correctly filled out, signed and attached.
Assignment coversheets
The assignment coversheet is available from the faculty website.
University and Faculty policy on assessment
Due dates and extensions
The due dates for the submission of assignments are given in the previous section. Please make every effort to submit work by the due dates. It is your responsibility to structure your study program around assignment deadlines, family, work and other commitments. Factors such as normal work pressures, vacations, etc. are seldom regarded as appropriate reasons for granting extensions. Students are advised to NOT assume that granting of an extension is a matter of course.
Requests for extentions must be made to the tutor before the due date.
You will be asked to forward original medical certificates in cases of
illness, and may be asked to provide other forms of documentation where
necessary.
Late assignment
Assignments received after the due date will be subject to a penalty
of10% per day, assignments received later than one week after the
duedate will not normally be accepted.
Return dates
Students can expect assignments to be returned within two weeks of the submission date or after receipt, whichever is later. Assessment for the unit as a whole is in accordance with the provisions of the Monash University Education Policy at: http://www.policy.monash.edu/policy-bank/academic/education/assessment/
We will aim to have assignment results made available to you within two weeks after assignment receipt.
Plagiarism, cheating and collusion
Plagiarism and cheating are regarded as very serious offences. In cases where cheating has been confirmed, students have been severely penalised, from losing all marks for an assignment, to facing disciplinary action at the Faculty level. While we would wish that all our students adhere to sound ethical conduct and honesty, I will ask you to acquaint yourself with Student Rights and Responsibilities (http://www.infotech.monash.edu.au/about/committees-groups/facboard/policies/studrights.html) and the Faculty regulations that apply to students detected cheating as these will be applied in all detected cases. In this University, cheating means seeking to obtain an unfair advantage in any examination or any other written or practical work to be submitted or completed by a student for assessment. It includes the use, or attempted use, of any means to gain an unfair advantage for any assessable work in the unit, where the means is contrary to the instructions for such work. When you submit an individual assessment item, such as a program, a report, an essay, assignment or other piece of work, under your name you are understood to be stating that this is your own work. If a submission is identical with, or similar to, someone else's work, an assumption of cheating may arise. If you are planning on working with another student, it is acceptable to undertake research together, and discuss problems, but it is not acceptable to jointly develop or share solutions unless this is specified by your lecturer. Intentionally providing students with your solutions to assignments is classified as "assisting to cheat" and students who do this may be subject to disciplinary action. You should take reasonable care that your solution is not accidentally or deliberately obtained by other students. For example, do not leave copies of your work in progress on the hard drives of shared computers, and do not show your work to other students. If you believe this may have happened, please be sure to contact your lecturer as soon as possible. Cheating also includes taking into an examination any material contrary to the regulations, including any bilingual dictionary, whether or not with the intention of using it to obtain an advantage. Plagiarism involves the false representation of another person's ideas, or findings, as your own by either copying material or paraphrasing without citing sources. It is both professional and ethical to reference clearly the ideas and information that you have used from another writer. If the source is not identified, then you have plagiarised work of the other author. Plagiarism is a form of dishonesty that is insulting to the reader and grossly unfair to your student colleagues.
Register of counselling about plagiarism
The university requires faculties to keep a simple and confidential register to record counselling to students about plagiarism (e.g. warnings). The register is accessible to Associate Deans Teaching (or nominees) and, where requested, students concerned have access to their own details in the register. The register is to serve as a record of counselling about the nature of plagiarism, not as a record of allegations; and no provision of appeals in relation to the register is necessary or applicable.
Non-discriminatory language
The Faculty of Information Technology is committed to the use of non-discriminatory language in all forms of communication. Discriminatory language is that which refers in abusive terms to gender, race, age, sexual orientation, citizenship or nationality, ethnic or language background, physical or mental ability, or political or religious views, or which stereotypes groups in an adverse manner. This is not meant to preclude or inhibit legitimate academic debate on any issue; however, the language used in such debate should be non-discriminatory and sensitive to these matters. It is important to avoid the use of discriminatory language in your communications and written work. The most common form of discriminatory language in academic work tends to be in the area of gender inclusiveness. You are, therefore, requested to check for this and to ensure your work and communications are non-discriminatory in all respects.
Students with disabilities
Students with disabilities that may disadvantage them in assessment should seek advice from one of the following before completing assessment tasks and examinations:
Deferred assessment and special consideration
Deferred assessment (not to be confused with an extension for submission of an assignment) may be granted in cases of extenuating personal circumstances such as serious personal illness or bereavement. Special consideration in the awarding of grades is also possible in some circumstances. Information and forms for Special Consideration and deferred assessment applications are available at http://www.monash.edu.au/exams/special-consideration.html. Contact the Faculty's Student Services staff at your campus for further information and advice.
|